^TAKE IT BACK! I'm not like that!
Anyway. Onto Twilight. I have no idea why they're so popular. They just ARE. People say that they "re-invent vampires". No. They don't. They destroy them. In realaity, all thes 'sparkle-pires' have in common with vampires is pale skin. Face it. Technically they're faries. Edward Cullen is urealistic and gives girls an idea of an 'ideal boyfriend' that is IMPOSSABLE. This results in girls saying single because they are "waiting for edward". And so the twitard gene is wiped out. I wish.
Anyways. Enough ranting.The ONE good thing about Dimlight (as I've named it) is that it gets girls who would only read texts to read SOMETHING. And then they finish it and look for more cr*ppy vampire fiction. And maybe find something better. Ect, ect. And one day, they go to the Terry Pratchett section. *shoot me for sugesting this*
This happened to my friend. it is possible.
note: Dimlight is not a SAGA. Nordic epics are sagas. Not soppy wastes of trees. Beowulf. Edward Cullen. Think about it, Stephanie Meyer.
note 2: What sort of name is Bella Swan anyway.
I'm going to need a swat team, ready to mobilize, street maps covering the whole of florida, a pot of coffee, 12 jammy dodgers and A FEZ.