Mediterranean wrote:I guess it was Willikins .but i am not sure that
Welcome, Mediterranean. Definitely was Willikens. I wasn't sure about this until this discussion. Re-reading the text makes it perfectly clear.
Moderators: Toothy, Tonyblack, Jason
Mediterranean wrote:I guess it was Willikins .but i am not sure that
Well most of the people who have responded to the question have read the book more than you have. I'm not sure why you are getting so snotty about it.LilMaibe wrote:I think tmoh has read it more often, judging by his pages.

LilMaibe wrote:You know that 'Re-reading the text makes it perfectly clear' is a pretty mean insult towards the threadopener?
tmoh wrote:Hey folks--looks like this thread got way more intense than I intended! :O And I haven't read the book *that* many times...hence why I was asking for other people's assistance. General consensus across this board and the other places I've asked seems to be that 1) the barman was Willikins, but 2) it was vague enough that I don't have to be *too* embarrassed about getting confused.I can live with that!
(And, um...I'm a "she," actually.)
LilMaibe wrote:You know that 'Re-reading the text makes it perfectly clear' is a pretty mean insult towards the threadopener?
LilMaibe wrote:And Dotsie: If I would tell you that 'everyone would get a certain things upon re-reading' if there's something you wouldn't understand, would you not take it as an insult?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests