Next you tell me I mustn't say UA is not the same trouserleg of time as Jingo, Last Continent or Going Postal
Moderators: Toothy, Tonyblack, Jason

Paranye wrote: [post]
LilMaibe wrote:Small disagreement?
I'm getting smacked around the face with the 'fact' that it doesn't matter what you write once you got a certain readership as they'll praise everything you'll do. If it doesn't matter if what you write is a textbook example of beginner's mistakes once you got published, I don't want to write.
And Dotsie:
No, I don't, though as you bring it up I can guess. Say, did he say anything about people who instead of judging a person for the person itself rely on generalisation, clichés and prejudice?

LilMaibe wrote:Small disagreement?
I'm getting smacked around the face with the 'fact' that it doesn't matter what you write once you got a certain readership as they'll praise everything you'll do. If it doesn't matter if what you write is a textbook example of beginner's mistakes once you got published, I don't want to write.
And Dotsie:
No, I don't, though as you bring it up I can guess. Say, did he say anything about people who instead of judging a person for the person itself rely on generalisation, clichés and prejudice?

Tonyblack wrote:And Dotsie:
No, I don't, though as you bring it up I can guess. Say, did he say anything about people who instead of judging a person for the person itself rely on generalisation, clichés and prejudice?
Tonyblack wrote:LilMaibe wrote:Small disagreement?
I'm getting smacked around the face with the 'fact' that it doesn't matter what you write once you got a certain readership as they'll praise everything you'll do. If it doesn't matter if what you write is a textbook example of beginner's mistakes once you got published, I don't want to write.
And Dotsie:
No, I don't, though as you bring it up I can guess. Say, did he say anything about people who instead of judging a person for the person itself rely on generalisation, clichés and prejudice?
You know, what really annoys me. is the small regard you hold for people who don't agree with you. In this post that I've quoted you essentially say that people who disagree with you don't have the intelligence to make their own minds up. You think that people who disagree with you are somehow brainwashed into thinking their favourite author can do no wrong - that we are unable to think for ourselves.
Could you possibly be more insulting?
And you wonder why people here are fed up with listening to your exalted opinions?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests