I like to divide such unfilmable films into 'couldn't' and 'shouldn't'.
For an example of 'couldn't', I would consider House of Leaves to be unfilmable in its entirety simply because of the nature of what's involved. It's literature that is virtually impossible to film.
And then there is 'shouldn't', novels that should never be adapted, not simply because they would be crappily adapted, but because they are crappy in the first place. Atlas Shrugged (despite it currently being made as an independent film trilogy) is a case in point.
Most books shouldn't be adapted into film. Watchmen was as close as a film adaptation could get to capturing the comic, but I read somewhere once that someone considered a miniseries, like A Game of Thrones.
"What have you been doing since you stole that antique TARDIS of yours, since you first landed on Skaro? Shouting 'Look at me!!! I'm not fighting a war!', while you battle the Daleks all the way through space and time."