Moderators: Jason, Toothy, Tonyblack
Who's Wee Dug wrote:If it has all the numbers Dotsie (just in case Mad is not online)if the 1 was missing itt would then be a 2nd printing of the 1st edition. although some start at zero to nine 0-9
I can't give you a screen shot as my books are still boxed,it would be the same as Mad's but the number sequence would be: 3 5 7 9 10 8 6 4 2 and so on the lowest number would be that print edition, if they ran zero to nine the number sequence would be: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 in a straight run and again 0 would indicate 1st /1st, hope that clarifies it for you.Dotsie wrote:Who's Wee Dug wrote:If it has all the numbers Dotsie (just in case Mad is not online)if the 1 was missing itt would then be a 2nd printing of the 1st edition. although some start at zero to nine 0-9
OK, so what would a second edition look like?
There is normally a limit of two book at a time Penners.Penfold wrote:Same here Chris. In fact none of my first editions are signed, although I might try and change that at next years Con.
And hellooo and welcome Hotrod!
Who's Wee Dug wrote:I can't give you a screen shot as my books are still boxed,it would be the same as Mad's but the number sequence would be: 3 5 7 9 10 8 6 4 2 and so on the lowest number would be that print edition, if they ran zero to nine the number sequence would be: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 in a straight run and again 0 would indicate 1st /1st, hope that clarifies it for you.Dotsie wrote:Who's Wee Dug wrote:If it has all the numbers Dotsie (just in case Mad is not online)if the 1 was missing itt would then be a 2nd printing of the 1st edition. although some start at zero to nine 0-9
OK, so what would a second edition look like?
Penfold wrote:Even one is better than none Dug, I just guess I'm easily pleased.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 3 guests