I loved the Greek Classics, particularly the Odyssey rather than the Iliad and loved the mythology which led to Norse myth of course which was far more satisfying and gritty, with no messing around with nymphs or golden showers and swans the whole time, but that also got me interested in classical history and the Celts especially and yet another mythology and the legends of King Arthur - so I was a sucker for Tolkien of course which did and continues to affect me profoundly.
Frankenstein and Dracula and the whole gothic gig - wonderful, but very overdone on TV and film and as we so often find on here, as reading the book first spoils the movie, so the reverse is also true, and so it spoiled Mary Shelley (and Stoker less so) for me. Mary Shelley's a big hero actually, an incredible, inspirational woman but, unlike Jane Austen, I can't read her with any degree of comfort or pleasure as her style's just too 'stiff' and mannered for me and too marred by movie imagery. The concepts in Frankstein I admire tremendously and her handling of the characterisation of the Dr. and his creation with their motivation and moral struggles are brilliant and insightful. It's just - I have to 'make' myself read it and reading to me as an adult is more to do with being caught in the moment and lost in the personalities and how the story comes to life and makes you care what happens? With most classical authors there's a lack of this and, for instance Dickens, absolutely leaves me cold to sit and read him, although I love some of his stories, even and especially Great Expectations, which was a set book when I went to senior school and that most definitely was my English teacher who even managed to make Wuthering Heights dull and lifeless!

