The Wee Free Men

Moderators: Jason, Toothy, Tonyblack

The Wee Free Men

Postby Jinx » Mon Sep 01, 2008 3:49 pm

I remember hearing some time ago, that Sam Raimi was going to direct a live action adaptation of The Wee Free Men. I haven't heard anything from this since and IMDb seems static on it now. All that appears on it's IMDb page is the title and 2010.

Has anyone heard any updates?
User avatar
Jinx
Member
 
Posts: 291
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 10:22 pm
Location: Glasgow, UK

Postby Jason » Mon Sep 01, 2008 4:00 pm

From what I can remember the last I heard about this was that Terry had been sent a script which he rejected because it appeared to be his book in name only.
TCOM-12 - Ludeum in tympanus
Editor Discworld Monthly
User avatar
Jason
Moderator
 
Posts: 1501
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 4:12 pm
Location: Reading - England

Postby Jinx » Mon Sep 01, 2008 4:07 pm

Oh well. At least they gave him the choice, unlike the makers of Lawnmower Man (AKA Stephen King's Lawnmower Man) - lol.
User avatar
Jinx
Member
 
Posts: 291
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2008 10:22 pm
Location: Glasgow, UK

Postby mroobalooba » Fri Oct 02, 2009 8:40 am

i actually started a discussion about making this fantastic book into a film back in 2004 a good few months before any news that it may well become a film was announced!
here's the original link to terrypratchettbooks forum:

http://www.terrypratchettbooks.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=5;t=000026

i had wanted to see it made into a film to see if i could get the opportunity to work on it.
meanwhile i've been playing around with my own script of the wee free men and storyboarded the intro sequence how i saw it.

Out of all the books i believe this would be one that could make for a fantastic film if done correctly because it contains enough content to appeal to a very wide audience and i don't think the book to screen adaption would need much changing at all...the biggest hurdle is how to incorporate Granny Aching into the story without constantly dragging an audience away from any action that might be taking place!

i would love to see Paul Kidby's version of the Feegles on the screen and enjoy his 'not quite realistic' approach to the characters.
Crivens!
User avatar
mroobalooba
New member
 
Posts: 17
Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 8:12 am
Location: Cornwall

Postby Lady Vetinari » Fri Oct 02, 2009 8:44 am

Jason wrote:From what I can remember the last I heard about this was that Terry had been sent a script which he rejected because it appeared to be his book in name only.


Tis why if ever I get published I shall have in my contract I do the first draft of the script and - so that at least some semblance of my story is out there! I really hate the way Hollywood messes around with stories. Why can't they just adapt FROM THE BOOK... (Bram Stoker's Dracula comes to mind ... :evil: )

I too think the Wee Free Men would make a brilliant Christmas or Easter BBC1 two-parter.
Who Watches The WatchMan?

Image
User avatar
Lady Vetinari
Member
 
Posts: 1028
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:17 pm
Location: Sator Square Patricians Palace Ankh Morpork

Postby Bouncy Castle » Fri Oct 02, 2009 12:16 pm

I'm still trying to get over the fact that the Yanks wanted to remove all references to death in Mort.

:lol: :lol: :lol:
Some are born great, some achieve greatness and some have greatness thrust upon them.

The rest of us are a bit crap.
User avatar
Bouncy Castle
Member
 
Posts: 11807
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 12:08 pm
Location: London

Postby Catch-up » Fri Oct 02, 2009 1:02 pm

Bouncy Castle wrote:I'm still trying to get over the fact that the Yanks wanted to remove all references to death in Mort.

:lol: :lol: :lol:


They wanted to remove Death the character - but still, what would have been left of the story?! :? :lol:
User avatar
Catch-up
Member
 
Posts: 6340
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:19 am
Location: Michigan, U.S.A.

Postby Bouncy Castle » Fri Oct 02, 2009 1:18 pm

Notalot!
Some are born great, some achieve greatness and some have greatness thrust upon them.

The rest of us are a bit crap.
User avatar
Bouncy Castle
Member
 
Posts: 11807
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 12:08 pm
Location: London

Postby Catch-up » Fri Oct 02, 2009 1:37 pm

As a general rule, I avoid watching movies made from books that I love. One exception that stands out in my mind is the Harry Potter series, especially the first one. It was the first time I sat in a movie theater dreading what was proven so wrong! I just remember thinking that everything looked exactly like I pictured it. The other exception was the LOTR movies. The story came across to me so much more vividly than it did reading the books - another exception!
User avatar
Catch-up
Member
 
Posts: 6340
Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:19 am
Location: Michigan, U.S.A.

Postby chris.ph » Fri Oct 02, 2009 5:10 pm

et is exactly the same as the book :) or vica versa
measuring intelligence by exam results is like measuring digestion by turd length
User avatar
chris.ph
Member
 
Posts: 8449
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 11:52 am
Location: swansea south wales

Postby Dotsie » Sat Oct 03, 2009 9:59 am

I've a feeling that the book was written after the film though, which makes it easy to follow it exactly!
What's up with this glass? Excuse me? Excuse me? This is my glass? I don't think so. My glass was full! And it was a bigger glass!
User avatar
Dotsie
Member
 
Posts: 9379
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 11:07 am

Postby Bouncy Castle » Mon Oct 05, 2009 12:09 pm

I've not read any of the HP books, but have seen a few of the movies, albeit on TV.

I was pleasantly surprised at the movies, and impressed at JK's imagination.

Mind you, I'm always super-impressed at any anyone who can write a book.
Some are born great, some achieve greatness and some have greatness thrust upon them.

The rest of us are a bit crap.
User avatar
Bouncy Castle
Member
 
Posts: 11807
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 12:08 pm
Location: London

Postby Lady Vetinari » Mon Oct 05, 2009 6:43 pm

Snape is WAAAAY better in the books than in the films though Alan does well with what he's got to work with. And Luscious ... I mean Lucius ... Malfoy - is uber evil - would make a great Ankh Morpork Guild Assassin!

There is not many book to movie I am absolutely wild about, but Tim Burton's Charlie film was par excellence (better than his crap James and the Giant Peach!)

I prefer televised adaptations where they can have more room to explore.
Who Watches The WatchMan?

Image
User avatar
Lady Vetinari
Member
 
Posts: 1028
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:17 pm
Location: Sator Square Patricians Palace Ankh Morpork

Postby Tina a.k.a.SusanSto.Helit » Mon Oct 05, 2009 8:28 pm

Lady Vetinari wrote: And Luscious ... I mean Lucius ... Malfoy - is uber evil - would make a great Ankh Morpork Guild Assassin!


I sense a crush.... neener neener neener Lucius and Lady Vet, Sitting in a tree, K-I-S-S-I-N-G... :twisted:

*Slaps Self Sillier... Stop that you Git!!!!!!!!!!!!*
Aha! So, Bob's yer uncle... very clever.
User avatar
Tina a.k.a.SusanSto.Helit
Member
 
Posts: 3885
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 7:25 pm
Location: Byron IL USA and The Quirm School for Young People ... it's genetic, you know

Postby kakaze » Tue Oct 06, 2009 4:50 pm

Dotsie wrote:I've a feeling that the book was written after the film though, which makes it easy to follow it exactly!


The film came out four years after the book. I remember people complaining that the movie was a little boring because it was too much like the book; there was nothing new.

I really don't like a lot of the stuff they did in the later films, adding or extending certain scenes to make it more "exciting" to watch.

I also didn't like several changes they made in the LOTR, particularly in regards to Aragorn and Samwise Gamgee.

And (I shudder to buck the thread) I didn't like Wee Free Men very much either. I liked the characters, but I didn't like Fairyland, for the same reason that I didn't like The Last Continent; there's no causality. When a plot relies so much on magic or dreams, then it's boring (in my opinion) to read because anything can happen without making any sense in regards to what's happened earlier. I've read A Hat Full of Sky, which I thought was much better, and I'm halfway through Wintersmith, which is Ok so far. I also dislike how Tiffany triumphs without really knowing how or why she did, particulary in Wee Free Men. She just wins because she's Granny Aching's granddaughter. It just seems like a lazy way to end the story to me.

However, like I said, I liked the characters (particularly Bigger-Than-Wee-Joon-But-Smaller-Than-Big-Joon, what a funny paragraph!)
kakaze
Member
 
Posts: 534
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 11:42 am

Next

Return to TV, film, theatre

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 2 guests

cron