mail review for pooh
Moderators: Toothy, Tonyblack, Jason


Bouncy Castle wrote:I'll wait till it comes on the telly.


pip wrote:http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/210997/Harry-Potter-Dealthy-Hallows-saves-best-till-last-
http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2010/nov/11/harry-potter-deathy-hallows-review
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/harry-potter/8127505/Harry-Potter-and-the-Deathly-Hallows-Part-I-first-review.html
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/reviews/first-night-harry-potter-and-the-deathly-hallows-part-1-odeon-and-empire-leicester-square-london-2131928.html
Non Daily mail reviews for more discerning readers.
DaveC wrote:pip wrote:http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/210997/Harry-Potter-Dealthy-Hallows-saves-best-till-last-
http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2010/nov/11/harry-potter-deathy-hallows-review
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/harry-potter/8127505/Harry-Potter-and-the-Deathly-Hallows-Part-I-first-review.html
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/reviews/first-night-harry-potter-and-the-deathly-hallows-part-1-odeon-and-empire-leicester-square-london-2131928.html
Non Daily mail reviews for more discerning readers.
Seems to be an average of 3 out of 5 stars. Still can't wait, though.

pip wrote:Bouncy Castle wrote:I'll wait till it comes on the telly.
You have to read the books first anyway.

Bouncy Castle wrote:pip wrote:Bouncy Castle wrote:I'll wait till it comes on the telly.
You have to read the books first anyway.
Shan't.


DaveC wrote:All of the reviews problems and praises so far suggest all the feeling that I had about the book. So at least its not a bad adaptation..

pip wrote:DaveC wrote:All of the reviews problems and praises so far suggest all the feeling that I had about the book. So at least its not a bad adaptation..
Pretty much what i was thinking.
Theres also the problem of artificially splitting a book in two hence the second part probably being the faster paced film.
DaveC wrote:pip wrote:DaveC wrote:All of the reviews problems and praises so far suggest all the feeling that I had about the book. So at least its not a bad adaptation..
Pretty much what i was thinking.
Theres also the problem of artificially splitting a book in two hence the second part probably being the faster paced film.
It's going to be hard for part to have any breathing space if all the camping and stuff is in this one, all action in he last one, fitting for a summer film but at least it will have the battles that they missed out on in the last film.

DaveC wrote:All of the reviews problems and praises so far suggest all the feeling that I had about the book. So at least its not a bad adaptation...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests