The Official Terry Pratchett Forums

by **LilMaibe** » Fri Apr 08, 2011 7:40 pm

On a small sidenote: Could it be that LC is one of the only around 5 books with full frontal nudity in it? (as in, it does get mentioned directly someone's naked)

by **pip** » Fri Apr 08, 2011 7:45 pm

isn't ridcully completely naked in nightwatch after the storm

by **Tonyblack** » Fri Apr 08, 2011 7:46 pm

Not talking about Ponder are you? :lol:

They both kept their hats on.

by **pip** » Fri Apr 08, 2011 7:52 pm

well the hat is the important bit :roll:

by **LilMaibe** » Fri Apr 08, 2011 7:55 pm

Tonyblack wrote:Not talking about Ponder are you? They both kept their hats on.

As if anyone'd look at the hat...

And yep x3
As said, around 5 books.
Ponder in LC, Ridcully in NW, The dryad in CoM...

by **pip** » Fri Apr 08, 2011 7:57 pm

Angua in every book shes in

by **Tonyblack** » Fri Apr 08, 2011 8:01 pm

pip wrote:Angua in every book shes in

And Sally!

by **pip** » Fri Apr 08, 2011 8:04 pm

actually quite a bit of nudity in the fifth elephant with vimes as well as wolf and his mates

by **Quatermass** » Fri Apr 08, 2011 11:55 pm

LilMaibe wrote:
Tonyblack wrote:Not talking about Ponder are you? They both kept their hats on.

As if anyone'd look at the hat...

And yep x3
As said, around 5 books.
Ponder in LC, Ridcully in NW, The dryad in CoM...

Not to mention Liessa in The Colour of Magic, at least once she prepares to give Hrun his final test, if you know what I mean. In fact, I didn't know what 'priapic' meant until later, so I didn't understand what they meant when they called Hrun priapic (presumably under his loin cloth).

And don't forget, Ridcully was technically naked in Hogfather when he used the Bloody Stupid Johnson Shower.

by **poohcarrot** » Sat Apr 09, 2011 3:45 am

deldaisy wrote:Bugger is common word used for anything... it has no gay references here in Australia...
Tinhead Ned is Ned Kelly

So what you're saying Del is, if TP was an ozzie, there'd be no gay reference with the word "bugger." :lol:

by **deldaisy** » Sat Apr 09, 2011 12:57 pm

A thousand other quite explicit terms for that Pooh.... its a morphed thing... because "bugger" is used so socially for everything else. Its not even considered a bad thing when kids say bugger (because the alternative is far worse). Its not used like that here.