If we genuinely listened to critics reviewing(or scoring where they do that) then half of literature and a really high proportion of music and films (Verdi's operas in particular
Moderators: Toothy, Tonyblack, Jason

poohcarrot wrote:It's CMOT Quibbler!
This is certainly going to be a marathon blog as the title suggests as we are already on page 5 and Q's only done one real review.
Quatermass wrote:Yeah, well, I lose my temper fairly easily when I am being criticised without (to me, anyway) due cause. I get touchy when people criticise my work
Dotsie wrote:Quatermass wrote:Yeah, well, I lose my temper fairly easily when I am being criticised without (to me, anyway) due cause. I get touchy when people criticise my work
Don't do a PhD until you have managed to work this out. The while point of a PhD is that you can defend your work against criticism - if you get mad, you'll have wasted three years.
Dotsie wrote:Quatermass wrote:Yeah, well, I lose my temper fairly easily when I am being criticised without (to me, anyway) due cause. I get touchy when people criticise my work
Don't do a PhD until you have managed to work this out. The while point of a PhD is that you can defend your work against criticism - if you get mad, you'll have wasted three years.

Quatermass wrote:Dotsie wrote:Quatermass wrote:Yeah, well, I lose my temper fairly easily when I am being criticised without (to me, anyway) due cause. I get touchy when people criticise my work
Don't do a PhD until you have managed to work this out. The while point of a PhD is that you can defend your work against criticism - if you get mad, you'll have wasted three years.
If you paid attention, I get antsy about criticism that is without due cause. If someone actually has a proper argument, I'll be sullen, but I will do my best to answer it. I was angry here because they attacked my scale rather than my actual arguments in the review.
Dotsie wrote:Now you pay attention - your work will be criticised. Constantly. They might even think they're right to the point where you don't get your PhD. They will be smarter than you, so you will have no argument. How will you like that then?
Being pissy won't help.
Was it the Spanish Inquistion's fault pip, no one expects them.pip wrote:Dotsie wrote:Quatermass wrote:Yeah, well, I lose my temper fairly easily when I am being criticised without (to me, anyway) due cause. I get touchy when people criticise my work
Don't do a PhD until you have managed to work this out. The while point of a PhD is that you can defend your work against criticism - if you get mad, you'll have wasted three years.
Part of the reason i waited as i even found the interogation for the Masters painful enough.


Quatermass wrote:Dotsie wrote:Now you pay attention - your work will be criticised. Constantly. They might even think they're right to the point where you don't get your PhD. They will be smarter than you, so you will have no argument. How will you like that then?
Being pissy won't help.
Could you please stop trying to discourage me? If I have an intense interest in a subject, I can commit to it, and it will raise my game, and thus my ability to deal with that problem.

Quatermass wrote:Could you please stop trying to discourage me?
Dotsie wrote:Quatermass wrote:Yeah, well, I lose my temper fairly easily when I am being criticised without (to me, anyway) due cause. I get touchy when people criticise my work
Don't do a PhD until you have managed to work this out. The while point of a PhD is that you can defend your work against criticism - if you get mad, you'll have wasted three years.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests