Too awful to imagine
Quatermass wrote:How do you know that the Journal of Cosmology has no credibility? I'm just asking.
Dotsie wrote:Quatermass wrote:How do you know that the Journal of Cosmology has no credibility? I'm just asking.
They've published sensationalist stuff in the past with no scientific basis, and their peer review process has been called into question more than once. NASA has distanced itself, probably because one of their ex-employees has published 'proof' of alien life three times
When there's actually proof of alien life, Science and Nature will be fighting over publishing it, no one else will get a look in.
Quatermass wrote:Maybe you can split it, Bouncy. I've seen tweets that have '1/2' and '2/2'.
Anyway, a shot in the arm for the panspermia theory...
raptornx01 wrote:Someone has claimed to have been fired for being a brony.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Ghost, Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 7 guests