Burn the non witches

(For General Discussion)

Moderators: Jason, Toothy, Tonyblack

Re: Burn the non witches

Postby Quatermass » Thu Oct 25, 2012 12:09 pm

CrysaniaMajere wrote:
Quatermass wrote:More on the Italian idiocy...

you wanted me? :D

Not unless you suffer from a bad case of the idiocies. :|
All you need to understand
Is everything you know is wrong!

-Weird Al Yankovic
User avatar
Posts: 5684
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2010 3:58 am

Re: Burn the non witches

Postby ChristianBecker » Thu Oct 25, 2012 12:31 pm

When I first heard about that I was like :shock:, too.
I can't really understand that is happening here and now.
On with their heads! I'm the clown prince of fools
if you don't get the joke it's your loss
Love and laughter you see are the new currency
'cause greed's coinage is not worth a toss

Exile yourself to the unforgiving continent of Wraeclast!
User avatar
Posts: 4190
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 7:21 pm
Location: Bingen

Re: Burn the non witches

Postby CrysaniaMajere » Thu Oct 25, 2012 1:01 pm

Quatermass wrote:
CrysaniaMajere wrote:
Quatermass wrote:More on the Italian idiocy...

you wanted me? :D

Not unless you suffer from a bad case of the idiocies. :|
^^ :roll: let's not investigate this point..

Newspapers say they were accused not because they didn't predict it for sure, but because they didn't warn the people of the risks, instead they said to the people that there was no real risk so anyone stayed at home. Of course if they had launched an alarm and the earthquake hadn't done damages, they would have been accused of causing panic.
What I think is that they wanted someone to blame, and didn't want it to be the managers who that night were laughing on the phone happy that they were having a good lot of work coming up in rebuilding the city and that 'we've got to hurry, and get this job, you don't get earthquakes every day', nor they wanted it to be the man in charge of 'Civil Protection' (or however it's called in english) who I read on internet articles did call the experts to calm people because he didn't want to cause panic and who later said 'what should I know? It's their fault, not mine'. Although I read he's still under investigation.
Now newspapers say that's what you get for letting scientists decide instead of politicians.
I could quote another italian sismologist who 10 years ago reported that L'Aquila was a city at great risk of earthquakes because of what was under the city which was not solid stable rock and therefore it was needed to make the weaker buildings safe. "why are not being accused the majors, province presidents, region presidents, councillors who given their role have responsibilities in civil protection? "

TBH when I heard it I was like :roll: more than :shock: because that's how things go, at least here.
Still, I'm not sure this is definite, there might be changes, who knows.
This is not about science, it's about politics, and we know it sucks.
User avatar
Posts: 1863
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 4:16 pm
Location: italy-genova


Return to The Broken Drum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Exabot [Bot] and 7 guests